New-customer event$50 off first pair·Buy 2 save 50%·Shop →

Recording law · 2026

Smart glasses recording laws, state by state.

Almost everyone worries about the wrong half. The camera is rarely the legal problem — the microphone is. Here is how US law actually splits the question, which states require everyone's consent, and the handful of habits that keep you on the right side of all of them.

Still deciding? Get the M02C, M08 and M08C comparison in your inbox, with your new-customer price already applied.

One email with the comparison, one follow-up a few days later. Unsubscribe any time.

Informational, not legal advice.This page is written for buyers, not lawyers. Statutes get amended, courts reinterpret them, and several states listed below are genuinely contested among the sources that track this. Nothing here is a substitute for reading your own state’s statute, checking your employer’s policy, or talking to a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction.

Two devices in one frame

A pair of camera glasses is, legally speaking, two devices sharing a temple: a camera and a microphone. American law treats them under entirely separate bodies of rule, and the mistake almost every buyer makes is assuming one answer covers both.

The camera is governed by privacy expectations and property rights. The microphone is governed by wiretap and eavesdropping statutes — the same laws written decades ago for telephone taps and concealed recorders. Those statutes do not care what the device looks like. A microphone in a frame is a microphone.

Video: usually lawful, with location limits

In a public place, photographing or filming what is plainly visible is generally lawful in the US. The reasoning is straightforward: on a street, in a park, at a stadium, nobody has a reasonable expectation that they will not be seen. Wearing the camera rather than holding it does not change that analysis.

What does change it:

  • Places where privacy is expected. Restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, medical exam areas, hotel rooms. Recording in these can be criminal regardless of intent, and several states have specific voyeurism statutes that attach serious penalties.
  • Private property. Shops, museums, theatres, cinemas, gyms, casinos, hospitals, schools and courthouses set their own rules. They cannot arrest you for filming, but they can ask you to stop or to leave, and refusing turns a photography question into a trespass question.
  • Workplaces.Your employer’s policy governs, and in regulated settings — clinical, legal, financial, security — it usually governs strictly. See our guides for nurses and security officers for how this plays out on the ground.
  • Other people’s homes. Not a legal grey area so much as a social one, but it becomes legal quickly if audio is running. Agents walking occupied properties should read the real estate guide.

Audio: the half that creates real exposure

Federal law — the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2511 — sets a one-party-consent floor. If you are a participant in a conversation, you may record it. States are free to be stricter, and a number of them are: they require the consent of every party to a private conversation before it may be recorded.

That is the whole trap. The video you captured walking through a market may be perfectly lawful while the audio recorded at the same instant is not. Most cameras record sound by default, which quietly drags the entire clip into wiretap territory.

The state table

The core group below appears on essentially every list that tracks this. Three more states appear on many lists with real carve-outs, and they are flagged as such rather than stated flatly — where sources disagree, the conservative reading is the safe one.

StateAudio consent ruleWhat to know
CaliforniaAll-partyApplies to confidential communications — the test is whether the parties reasonably expected privacy
ConnecticutAll-party (calls)All-party for telephone recording; in-person is treated more permissively under the criminal statute
DelawareTreat as all-partyTwo statutes point different ways and no court has settled it; the cautious reading is all-party
FloridaAll-partyConsent required from everyone party to a private conversation
IllinoisAll-party (private)Statute rewritten in Dec 2014 after the previous one was struck down; turns on a reasonable expectation of privacy
MarylandAll-partyLong-standing all-party statute, frequently litigated
MassachusettsAll-party in effectThe statute criminalises secret recording — disclosure is the operative element
MontanaAll-partyFramed around notice to all parties
New HampshireAll-party
PennsylvaniaAll-party
WashingtonAll-party
MichiganContested — assume all-partyThe statute reads all-party, but case law recognises an exception for a participant recording their own conversation
NevadaSplitAll-party for telephone calls; in-person conversations are treated more permissively
OregonSplitAll-party for in-person conversations; one-party for telephone and electronic communications
VermontNo state statuteThe one state with no general wiretap or eavesdropping law; the federal one-party rule fills the gap
Every other stateGenerally one-partyCheck your state — wording, carve-outs and penalties still vary considerably

Counts published elsewhere range from eleven to about fifteen depending on how the split and contested states are handled. If your state is anywhere in that band, or if you are not sure, the practical answer is the same: get everyone’s consent, or leave the audio off.

Penalties are not uniform either. Violating an all-party statute can be a criminal offence as well as the basis of a civil claim, and the grading runs from misdemeanour to felony depending on the state and the circumstances. Check the statute rather than assuming the worst case or the best one.

Four things that catch people out

1. Calls across state lines

A conversation between a one-party state and an all-party state has two sets of rules pointing at it, and the strict one tends to win in practice. Cross-border calls are exactly the situation where a two-second announcement is cheaper than a legal opinion.

2. “Private” is a test, not a place

Several statutes hinge on whether the speakers had a reasonable expectation of privacy — not on whether they were technically indoors. Two people talking quietly at a restaurant table can qualify. A speech to a crowd does not.

3. Consent has to be real

Announcing that you are recording and continuing after nobody objects is the ordinary pattern. Recording someone who has said no is not made lawful by having told them.

4. Your employer’s policy is a separate layer

Lawful and permitted are different questions. Hospitals, schools, courts, secure sites and most corporate offices have written rules about recording devices, and those rules apply to eyewear whether or not they mention it by name. The meetings guide covers the professional version of this.

Practical rules for wearers

Do:say what they are the first time someone asks — the question is usually curiosity, and a straight answer ends it. Ask before recording a conversation; it satisfies every consent regime at once. Capture deliberately, in short bursts, for a reason. Take them off in restrooms, changing rooms, clinical areas and other people’s homes. Check the venue’s rules before you walk in with a camera on your face.

Don’t:record conversations you are not part of. Don’t assume your home state’s rule travels with you. Don’t treat a public place as permission to record its bathroom, its staff areas or its private rooms. Don’t rely on a device to disclose for you — we do not document a recording-indicator light on any OXIVUE frame, and even where hardware signals exist, people miss them. Disclosure is a thing you say.

Where the OXIVUE range sits

Two of these questions are answered by which product you buy rather than how you behave with it.

Frames and watches with no camera

  • M01 Pro — $19.90. The audio frame. The specification line reads Camera: None · audio only — open-ear directional speakers, Bluetooth, sun or clear lens, and nothing to explain in a room where a camera would be awkward. Currently open for reservation rather than immediate shipping.
  • The watch line. No camera anywhere in the range: the ZL54CJ at $29.90 and ZL02C Pro at $33.90 are in stock, and the round Z185C at $69.90 is on preorder.

Frames with a camera

The M08 at $149, the M02C at $159, the M08C at $169 and the M14 at $199 all carry an 8 MP camera. They should be used consistent with the law where you are — which is the same standard that applies to the phone already in your pocket, applied to a device people can see.

One design decision is relevant here. Capture begins with a deliberate action on the frame — a single touch on the M08, a slide-touch control on the M14 — rather than a rolling background recording. That has been the position since the beginning: there if you need it, quiet when you don’t. It makes the polite version easy. It does not make the disclosure optional.

The M08, M02C and M08C ship from our Chicago, IL warehouse and typically arrive in 5–9 business days in the US; the M14 and all international orders run 9–14 business days. Returns are handled under our returns policy: no refunds except transit damage (replaced or refunded); faults are repaired or replaced under the 2-year warranty. If you are still deciding between the frames, the under-$200 buyer’s guide compares them side by side, and the full specification table has every line.

The short version

Video in public is usually fine. Audio is where the statutes live, and roughly a dozen states want everyone in the conversation to agree first. Saying “these record, is that alright?” costs two seconds and clears the strictest rule in the country. If you would rather never have the conversation at all, buy a frame without a camera — we make one, and we would rather sell you the right thing.

Frequently asked questions

Is it legal to record video with smart glasses in public?

Generally yes. In a public place where nobody has a reasonable expectation of privacy, filming what you can already see is usually lawful in the US. The exceptions are locations rather than devices: restrooms, changing rooms, locker rooms, medical exam areas, and anywhere a voyeurism statute applies. Private property is separate again — shops, museums, theatres, gyms, casinos, courthouses, schools and hospitals set their own rules, and being asked to stop is a property matter, not a constitutional debate.

What is an all-party consent state?

A state whose wiretap or eavesdropping statute requires every participant in a private conversation to consent before it can be recorded, rather than just one. Federal law (18 U.S.C. § 2511) sets a one-party floor — you may record a conversation you are part of — and states are free to be stricter. Eleven states appear on essentially every all-party list: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Montana, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. Michigan, Nevada and Oregon appear on many lists with significant carve-outs.

Does recording audio with glasses count as wiretapping?

It can. Wiretap and eavesdropping statutes are written around the act of intercepting a communication, not around the shape of the device — a microphone in a frame is treated the same way as a hidden voice recorder. This is why the video and audio questions have different answers: the video half may be perfectly lawful while the audio half, captured at the same moment, is the part that creates exposure.

Which OXIVUE products have no camera?

The M01 Pro is our audio frame — the specification is literally 'Camera: None · audio only' — at $19.90, currently open for reservation rather than immediate shipping. The watch line has no camera either: the ZL54CJ at $29.90 and the ZL02C Pro at $33.90 are in stock, and the round Z185C at $69.90 is on preorder. If a camera is the thing you would rather not explain at work or at a client's home, those are the honest recommendations.

How should I use camera glasses without upsetting anyone?

Treat them as a camera you happen to be wearing. Say what they are the first time someone asks, capture deliberately rather than continuously, take them off in restrooms, changing rooms, clinical areas and other people's homes, and ask before recording a conversation — which also keeps you compliant in every consent regime at once. Capture on OXIVUE frames is a deliberate action rather than a rolling background recording, but the disclosure is still your job, not the hardware's.

Does this guide count as legal advice?

No. It is a plain-English orientation to how these rules are usually structured, written for buyers rather than lawyers. Statutes are amended, courts reinterpret them, several states are genuinely contested, and none of this addresses your specific situation. Read your state's statute, check your employer's policy, and speak to a qualified attorney in your jurisdiction before relying on any of it.

OXIVUE M08$149.00
Shop now